Opinions Case Hear Opinion Announcement - June 25, 1974 U.S. Supreme Court Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 (1974) Lehman v.
Harry J. Lehman, a political candidate, sought to advertise on the public transit of Shaker Heights, Ohio, but his advertisement was rejected under a rule that no political advertising could be placed in the cars. He challenged the rule on free speech and equal protection grounds.
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 (1974), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a city's ban on political advertising within its public transportation system. The Court ruled that ad space on public transit is not a "public forum", meaning that speech within this space receives lower First Amendment protections.
Harry Lehman Respondent City of Shaker Heights Location City of Shaker Heights Docket no. 73-328 Decided by Burger Court Lower court Ohio Supreme Court Citation 418 US 298 (1974) Argued Feb 26 - 27, 1974 Decided Jun 25, 1974 Advocates Leonard J. Schwartz argued the cause for the petitioner Paul R. Donaldson argued the cause for the respondents
Harry J. LEHMAN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. Supreme Court 418 U.S. 298 94 S.Ct. 2714 41 L.Ed.2d 770 Harry J. LEHMAN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. No. 73—328. Argued Feb. 26—27, 1974. Decided June 25, 1974. Syllabus
Petitioner Harry Lehman, a candidate for state office, who was refused available advertising space on vehicles of a city transit system, brought this suit challenging the constitutionality of the municipal policy on which the refusal was based on not permitting political advertising but allowing other types of public transit advertising.
The Petitioner, Lehman (Petitioner), a candidate for the office of state representative, sought to promote his candidacy by purchasing car card space on the Shaker Heights Rapid Transit System for the months of August, September and October. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights 418 U.S. 298 (1974) In July 1970, Henry J. Lehman, a candidate for state representative, attempted to purchase advertising space promoting his candidacy on the Shaker Heights Rapid Transit System.
Full title: LEHMAN v . CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS ET AL Court: U.S. Date published: Jun 25, 1974 Citations 418 U.S. 298 (1974) 94 S. Ct. 2714 Citing Cases White Coat Waste Project v. Greater Richmond Transit Co. GRTC, relying on Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights , contends that prohibitions on political advertising on…
Harry J. Lehman, plaintiff-appellant, sought a determination of whether his constitutional rights, under Section 11 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution, and the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, were violated by the terms of a written agreement between defendant-appellees, city of Shaker Heights and Metromedia,...
United States Supreme Court 418 U.S. 298 (1974) Facts The City of Shaker Heights (defendant) operated a public transit system and sold advertising space on its vehicles to purveyors of goods and services. However, the city refused to sell space for political advertisements.
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights Citation. 418 U.S. 298, 94 S. Ct. 2714, 41 L. Ed. 2d 770, 1974 U.S. Powered by Law Students: Don't know your Bloomberg Law login? Register here Brief Fact Summary. Lehman (Petitioner) is running for political office and wants to advertise on the public transit system. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights, 418 U.S. 298 , was a case in which the United States Supreme Court upheld a city's ban on political advertising within its public transportation system. The Court ruled that ad space on public transit is not a "public forum", meaning that speech within this space receives lower First Amendment protections.[1]
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights Supreme Court of the United States June 25, 1974 418 U.S. 298 94 S.Ct. 2714 (Approx. 13 pages) Ask a question 94 S.Ct. 2714. Supreme Court of the United States. Harry J. LEHMAN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. No. 73—328. Argued Feb. 26—27, 1974.
LEHMAN v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. Supreme Court Cases 418 U.S. 298 (1974) Search all Supreme Court Cases Case Overview Legal Principle at Issue Whether a city-owned placard on the side of a city bus, which has been opened for commericial advertising use but not political advertising, is a public forum. Action Affirmed (includes modified).
Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 20,000 case briefs (and counting) keyed to over 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-br...
LEHMAN v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. Supreme Court Cases 418 U.S. 298 (1974) Search all Supreme Court Cases Case Overview Related Cases LEILA JEANNE HILL, AUDREY HIMMELMANN, AND EVERITT W. SIMPSON, JR. v. COLORADO, et al. Decided: June 28, 2000 A Colorado statue establishes a 100-foot zone around the entrance to any "health care facility."
Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights - Case Briefs - 1973 Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights PETITIONER:Harry Lehman RESPONDENT:City of Shaker Heights LOCATION:City of Shaker Heights DOCKET NO.: 73-328 DECIDED BY: Burger Court (1972-1975) LOWER COURT: Ohio Supreme Court CITATION: 418 US 298 (1974) ARGUED: Feb 26, 1974 / Feb 27, 1974 DECIDED: Jun 25, 1974
Harry J. LEHMAN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF SHAKER HEIGHTS et al. —328. Argued Feb. 26—27, 1974: Decision Date: 25 June 1974 ... This case presents the question whether a city which operates a public rapid transit system and sells advertising space for car cards on its vehicles is required by the First and Fourteenth Amendments ...
UpLaw is an online law library providing the resources and tools necessary to represent your legal rights.
You’re currently reading category lehman , an entry on chefkellylehman.com